|
P0902 A declaration by an adjuster for a public entity that he had mailed a notice of claim rejection to the claimant's attorney resulted in a presumption that the notice was received, and a declaration by the attorney's secretary that it had never been received is not sufficient to create a question of fact about when the statute of limitations began running on an action based on the claim.CitationHIM v CITY AND COUNTY OF SF (Mailed Notice) 133 CA4 437 [See: GovCº 945.6, 913, 915.2; CCP 1013; Katelaris v County 92 CA4 1211, P/AT 11/01; Craig v Brown & Root 84 CA4 416, T/AT 12/00]
|
|
