|
P0801 An employee of the University of California is required to exhaust all administrative remedies provided by the state Regents before suing for retaliatory termination as a whistleblower, even though plaintiff seeks money damages that available administrative remedies do not provide.CitationCAMPBELL v REGENTS OF UC (University Whistleblower) 35 C4 311 [See: CA Const IX, 9(a); GovC 12653; LabC 1102.5; SF Labor Council v Regents 26 C3 785; Ishimatsu v Regents 266 CA2 854; Regents v City of SM 77 CA3 130; Johnson v City of Loma Linda 24 C4 61, T/AT 9/00]
|
|
