Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
4118 An ordinance that eliminates liability for animals that trespass on unfenced land is not a taking that requires just compensation (i.e., inverse condemnation) because in permitting landowners to lawfully fence animals out, it does not deprive the landowners of all beneficial or economic use of their land.CitationHERZBERG v COUNTY / PLUMAS (Fencing Out) 133 CA4 1 [See: F&AC 17124; Shively v Dye Creek 29 CA4 1620, T/AT 12/94; Lucas v SC Coastal 505 US 1003; Brown v Legal Fnd 538 US 216] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||