Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
P0901 If a claim is based in significant part on activity protected by the SLAPP statute, the entire action may be struck in response to an anti-SLAPP motion, even though some of the claims are based on conduct not protected by the statute.CitationPEREGRINE v SHEPPARD MULLIN (Ponzi SLAPP) 133 CA4 658 [See: CCP 425.16; Kids Against Pollution v CA Dental (RevGrtd) 108 CA4 1003, T/AT 6/03] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||