|
4082 Sales of phones below cost by a provider of wireless phone service to its customers and its refusal to sell phones to small wireless service providers for resale to their customers, allegedly making it impossible for the small providers to compete, did not pose a significant threat to competition and did not violate the Unfair Competition Law.CitationPEOPLE'S CHOICE v VERIZON (Wireless Combat) 131 CA4 656 [31 819 See: B&PC 17203; US v Colgate 250 US 300; CelTech v LA Cellular 20 C4 163, T/AT 5/99]
|
|
