P0858 A provision in a memorandum of understanding between a city and a public employees' association requiring the city and an employee to share equally in the cost of a hearing officer in the employee's appeal from adverse employment action taken by the city unconstitutionally chilled the due process right to a meaningful hearing; a waiver of that right could not be made by the association on behalf of its members.CitationFLORIO v CITY OF ONTARIO (Cost Sharing) 130 CA4 1462 [See: 42 USC 1983; CA Teachers v State 20 C4 327; Phillips v State Personnel Bd 184 CA3 651; State v Superior Court 32 C4 1234, P/AT 7/04]
|
|