|
P0804 After plaintiff repeatedly failed to comply with multiple discovery requests and orders compelling discovery, imposing monetary sanctions, and warning that further non-compliance could result in terminating sanctions, a stipulation signed by plaintiff and providing that failure to comply with a new discovery request by a specified date would entitle the other party to move for terminating sanctions waived the requirement of a prior order directing compliance with the discovery request and justified the imposition of terminating sanctions without such an order.CitationMILEIKOWSKY v TENET HEALTH SYSTEM (Terminating Sanction) 128 CA4 262 [See: CCP 2031, 2023; Ruvalcaba v Gov't Employees 222 CA3 1579]
|
|
