|
4110 Prior incidents of outsiders entering the fence of an after-school boys and girls club were not sufficiently similar to impose on the club a duty to protect plaintiff against an attack by an outsider who entered the fence and threw a rock that struck plaintiff; since the identity of the rock thrower was unknown, there was not sufficient evidence to create an issue of fact about whether lack of supervision was a cause of the assault.CitationRINEHART v BOYS & GIRLS CLUB (Rock Throwing) 133 CA4 419 [See: Rowland v Christian 69 C2 108; Ann M v Pacific Plaza 6 C4 666, T/AT 2/94; Sharon P v Arman 21 C4 1181, T/AT 1/00; Saelzler v Advanced 25 C4 763, T/AT 6/01]
|
|
