|
3957 Plaintiff's reports to a landlord that a fellow tenant had been engaging in a course of harassment, verbal insults and annoyances, and on one occasion drove in a way that forced plaintiff to swerve to avoid an accident were not sufficiently similar prior incidents to impose on the landlord a duty to protect plaintiff against subsequent physical attack by the fellow tenant, but express and implied covenants of quiet enjoyment in the plaintiff's lease did impose a duty on the landlord, breach of which could give rise to liability for damages.CitationANDREWS v MOBILEAIRE ESTATES (Trailer Park Feud) 125 CA4 578 [See: CivC 1927, 3304; Madhani v Cooper 106 CA4 412, T/AT 3/03; Ann M v Pacific Plaza 6 C4 666, T/AT 2/94; Sharon P v Arman 21 C4 1181, T/AT 1/00; Davis v Gomez 207 CA3 1401; Petroleum Collections v Swords 48 CA3 841; Guntert v City 55 CA3 131]
|
|
