4046 In a suit for retaliatory adverse employment action brought by an employee against a former employer, allegations that the employer subjected the plaintiff to constant nitpicking criticism was not sufficient to plead adverse employment action.CitationPINERO v SPECIALTY RESTAURANTS (Nitpicking Criticism) 130 CA4 635 [See: GovC 12940(h); Iwekaogwu v City of LA 75 CA4 803, T/AT 11/99; McRae v Dep't of Corrections 127 CA4 779, T/AT 4/05; Akers v County of SD 95 CA4 1441, T/AT 3/03; Thomas v Dep't of Corrections 77 CA4 507, T/AT 2/00; Yanowitz v L'Oreal (RevGrtd) 106 CA4 1036, T/AT 4/03]
|
|