Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
3953 A rebate offer that may be accepted by making a subsequent purchase from a third party, but the benefits of which are also available to persons who made the purchase from a third party simultaneously with or before purchasing the item on which the rebate is offered, does not violate any statute or rule of law.CitationPOLLARD v ERICSSON / CLAUSEN v NOKIA (Cell Phone Rebate) 125 CA4 214 [See: CivC 1770; Kramer v Intuit 121 CA4 574 T/AT 9/04] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||