|
P0845 A post-judgment discovery order that neither enforced nor stayed execution of the judgment and made no determination regarding the substantive rights of the parties was not appealable; extraordinary writ relief is available only when the issue is of widespread interest, or presents a significant and novel constitutional issue; or the trial court's order deprived a party of an opportunity to present a substantial portion of its case; or conflicting trial court interpretations of the law require a resolution of the conflict; or the trial court's order is both clearly erroneous as a matter of law and substantially prejudices petitioner's case; or the party seeking the writ lacks an adequate means to attain relief; and the petitioner will suffer harm or prejudice in a manner that cannot be corrected on appeal.CitationRODEN v AMERISOURCE BERGEN (Post-judgment Discovery) 130 CA4 211 [See: CCP 904.1, 708.030, 2017; Roden v Bergen 107 CA4 620; Lakin v Watkins 6 C4 644, T/AT 2/94; Omaha Indem v Superior Court 209 CA3 1266]
|
|
