|
4047 REVIEW DENIED In an action for wrongful termination because of plaintiff's pregnancy, evidence that plaintiff told her employer that she might be getting a child and that she was trying to get pregnant was insufficient to establish a triable issue about whether the employer knew she was pregnant and terminated her because of pregnancy, particularly in view of plaintiff's failure to present evidence that she was visibly pregnant or that she or her fellow employees told her employer she was pregnant; after she was terminated, plaintiff's statement to her employer that she was pregnant and her employer's response, "What were you thinking?" also did not raise a triable issue about the reason for her termination.CitationTROP v SONY PICTURES (Pregnant Assistant) 129 CA4 1133 [See: GovC 12900 etseq; Phillips v St Mary Reg Med Ctr 96 CA4 218, T/AT 3/02; Brundage v LA Office 57 CA4 228, T/AT 9/97 ]
|
|
