|
P0876 It was found that an agreement to submit to judicial reference was not procedurally unconscionable because it was clearly written, entirely capitalized, easily understood, and required initialing by both parties; it was not substantively unconscionable, since its terms subjected both sides to the requirement of judicial reference and did not limit the available relief; statutory prohibition against arbitration agreements in contracts for the construction of single family residences does not apply to agreements to submit to judicial reference.CitationTREND HOMES v SUPERIOR COURT (Judicial Reference) 131 CA4 950 [See: CCP 638 - 645.1; Armendariz v Foundation 24 C4 83, T/AT 9/00; Greenbriar v Superior Court 117 CA4 337, P/AT 5/04]
|
|
