|
4039 Delay in processing a DNA sample that eventually established the innocence of plaintiff and subsequent delay in releasing plaintiff from custody were not violations of fundamental substantive due process rights and therefore did not give rise to an action under the federal Civil Rights Act.CitationJIMENEZ v COUNTY OF LA (Delayed DNA Test) 130 CA4 133 [See: 42 USC 1983; Pennington v Hobson 719 FS 760; Reno v Flores 507 US 292; Washington v Glucksberg 521 US 702; Harlow v Fitzgerald 457 US 800; Hope v Pelzer 536 US 730]
|
