Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
3991 REVIEW DENIED Under a policy containing a total pollution exclusion, the insured has no obligation to defend an insured against an action based on the allegation that third party claimants were injured by inhaling silica dust that resulted from the insured's design, manufacture, and use of sandblasting materials and safety equipment.CitationGARAMENDI v GOLDEN EAGLE INS (Total Pollution Exclusion) 127 CA4 480 [See: MacKinnon v Truck Ins 31 C4 635, T/AT 10/03] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||