Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
4094 The manufacturer of an allegedly defective automobile does not owe the owner a duty to protect against negligent infliction of emotional distress resulting from injury sustained by a person using the vehicle while the owner is not present.CitationYAN GU v BMW (Owner's Emotional Distress) 132 CA4 195 [See: Rowland v Christian 69 C2 108; Dillon v Legg 68 C2 728; Potter v Firestone 6 C4 965, T/AT 2/94] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||