|
p0717 A collective bargaining agreement between faculty and a Community College District defining "grievance" in terms that excluded "a complain [sic] which may, or should as interpreted by the District, be appealed or redressed through some other complaint, appellant [sic], or redress process" was ambiguous, justifying the admission of extrinsic evidence to resolve the ambiguity.CitationHARTNELL COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT v SUPERIOR COURT (Grievance Arbitration) 124 CA4 1443 [See: CCP 1281.2; United v City and County of SF 53 CA4 1021; Amalgamated v LA County MTA 107 CA4 673, P/AT 7/04]
|
|
