Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
1086 REVIEW DENIED Regardless of whether an organization such as MADD is a "business establishment," expulsion of a member for disruptive behavior does not violate the Unruh Act.CitationHARRIS v MADD (Disruptive Behavior) 40 CA4 16 [See: CivC 51; Isbister v Boys' Club 40 C3 72; Warfield v Peninsula 10 C4 594, T/AT 8/95] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||