|
1065 Since the public already has a right to peaceably protest abortion, a respondent's success in resisting a petition for an injunction against publication of a brochure concerning abortion practitioners did not confer a substantial benefit upon the general public and, therefore, did not entitle the respondent to attorney fees under the private attorney general statute.CitationFAMILY PLANNING v POWERS (Pro-life Warrior) 39 CA4 1561 [See: CCP 1021.5; Serrano v Priest 20 C3 25; Press v Lucky 34 C3 311; Woodland v City Council 23 C3 917]
|
|
