Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
0977 REVIEW DENIED The fact that an action against an excess coverage policy insured might result in a judgment in excess of the primary coverage does not obligate the excess carrier to defend, because its obligation to defend does not begin until primary coverage is exhausted.CitationCITY v TWIN CITY (Excess Defense) 37 CA4 1072 [See: Gray v Zurich 65 C2d 263; Montrose v SuperCt 6 C4 287, T/AT 1/94] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||