0766 REVIEW GRANTED A plaintiff who was wrongfully terminated after being fraudulently induced to relocate for the purpose of accepting employment can successfully state tort claims for wrongful termination in violation of public policy, fraud, negligent misrepresentation resulting in financial losses, and intentional infliction of emotional distress, but cannot successfully state a claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress, because workers' compensation is the exclusive remedy for job-related negligence resulting in personal injury.CitationLAZAR v SUPERIOR COURT (Cross Country Fraud) 30 CA4 496 [See: Hunter v Up-Right 6 C4 1174; LabC 970, 3600 etseq; Foley v Interactive 47 C3 654; Tameny v ARCO 27 C3 167; Gantt v Sentry 1 C4 1083; Fermino v Fedco 7 C4 701]
|
|