Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
1019 After determining that the only evidence in support of plaintiff's sexual harassment claim was plaintiff's hypnotically induced recollection, the trial court was correct in excluding plaintiff's testimony and ordering a nonsuit.CitationSCHALL v LOCKHEED (Hypnotic Recollection) 37 CA4 1485 [See: EvC 795; People v Shirley 31 C3 18] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||