- Home
- Bios
- Try Us Free
- Subscribe
- Case Library
- CA Evidence
Discovery
Civ-Pro - Torts
- SLAPPS
- Text Summaries
- Search
- Support
Case Summary |
|
1026 REVIEW DENIED A ski resort has no duty to pad ski lift equipment to protect skiers who collide with it.CitationCONNELLY v MAMMOTH MT (Unpadded Tower) 39 CA4 8 [See: Knight v Jewett 3 C4 296, T/AT 10/92; Branco v Kearny 37 CA4 184, T/AT 9/95] |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||