Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
0985 REVIEW DENIED A litigant who inexcusably allowed a default to be taken against him and then retained an attorney whose neglect results in a default judgment is not entitled to relief under CCP 473, which requires a court to vacate a default resulting from an attorney's neglect.CitationCISNEROS v VUEVE (Inexcusable Default) 37 CA4 906 [See: CCP 473; Rutan v Summit 173 CA3 965] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||