Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
1027 REVIEW DENIED Whether an attorney should have asserted an affirmative defense based on the exclusivity of the workers' compensation remedy is a question of fact; if the interests of an insurer are not adverse to the interests of its insured, an attorney hired by the insurer to represent the insured owes the insurer a duty of reasonable care.CitationUNIGARD v O'FLAHERTY & BELGUM (Attorney's Duty) 38 CA4 1229 [See: Doney v Tambouratgis 23 C3 91; Rowland v County 220 CA3 331] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||