Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
0811 REVIEW DENIED Cumis counsel representing an insured being defended by an insurer under a reservation of rights does not owe the insurer a duty to act reasonably in representing the insured, but does owe the insurer a duty to make disclosures required by statute.CitationASSURANCE v HAVEN (Cumis Duties) 32 CA4 78 [See: Gray v Zurich 65 C2 263; SDFCU v Cumis 162 CA3 358; CivC 2860] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||