|
0828 REVIEW DENIED A plaintiff has no cause of action against a defendant's insurer for breach of the obligation to defend its insured; claims that, to manipulate plaintiff into having sexual intercourse with him, a priest misused information obtained while counseling plaintiff were so intertwined with claims of sexual misconduct that there was no coverage under the policy.CitationJANE D v ORDINARY MUT (Molesting Priest) 32 CA4 643 [See: Horace Mann v Barbara B 4 C4 1076, T/AT 5/93; JC Penney v MK 52 C3 1009]
|
|
