Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
0831 REVIEW DENIED Plaintiff's knowledge that part of her breast implant had migrated to her arm and her belief that this resulted from her surgeon's negligence was sufficient to start the statute of limitations running on her claim against the manufacturer of the implant, even though plaintiff did not suspect that the problem resulted from defects in the implant.CitationBRISTOL-MYERS v SUPERIOR COURT (Migrating Implant) 32 CA4 959 [See: CCP 340.5, Jolly v Eli Lilly 44 C3 1103] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||