Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
0813 REVIEW GRANTED In an action for intentional interference with prospective business advantage, a defense based on the privilege to compete is defeated if the defendant's conduct is independently actionable as a violation of statute or separate tort.CitationSF DESIGN v PORTMAN (Apparel Mart) 32 CA4 716 [See: Tuttle v Buck 119 NW 946; Youst v Longo 43 C3 64; Chapman v California Mart 2 CA3 846; Katz v Kapper 7 CA2 1; A-Mark v General Mills 148 CA3 312] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||