|
0815 REVIEW DENIED Expert testimony that defendant's conduct was a substantial factor in producing plaintiff's injury is sufficient to justify submission of the causation issue to a jury; having established that defendant's conduct was a cause of plaintiff's injury, plaintiff does not have the burden of apportioning how much of the damage resulted from defendant's conduct.CitationESPINOSA v LITTLE (Lithium Brain Damage) 31 CA4 1304 [See: Mitchell v Gonzales 54 C3 1041; Alef v Alta Bates Hospital 5 CA4 208; Bromme v Pavitt 5 CA4 1487; Jones v Ortho 163 CA3 396]
|
|
