|
1061 New York is a more appropriate forum than California for the claims of plaintiffs who reside in New York and sustained injury as a result of their grandmothers' ingestion of DES in New York, and a trial court, therefore, did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the claims on the ground of forum non conveniens.CitationBOAZ v BOYLE (DES Jurisdiction) 40 CA4 700 [See: In re DES 789 FS 552; Sindell v Abbott 26 C3 588; Bichler v Eli Lilly 55 NY2 571; Enright v Eli Lilly 77 NY2 377; Turpin v Sortini 21 C3 220; Piper v Reyno 454 US 235; Gulf v Gilbert 330 US 501; Price v Atchison 42 C2 577]
|
|
