|
1052 The foreseeability that gang violence will occur on streets adjacent to a landholder's premises is not sufficient to impose on the landholder a duty to protect users of those streets against acts of violence by gangs that congregate on the landholder's premises; the Street Terrorism Enforcement and Prevention Act (PenC 186.20) does not authorize a civil action for damages resulting from the congregation of gangs on private property.CitationMEDINA v HILLSHORE (Gang Hangout) 40 CA4 477 [See: Ann M v Pacific Plaza 6 C4 666, T/AT 2/94; Martinez v Pacific Bell 225 CA3 1557; Steinmetz v Stockton 169 CA3 1142; Rosales v Stewart 113 CA3 130]
|
|
