|
0907 DEPUBLISHED In a malicious prosecution claim against attorneys, allegations that the original attorney failed to investigate the facts before filing the underlying action and that an attorney who substituted into the case failed to investigate the facts before continuing to prosecute the action are sufficiently to allege malice.CitationSLATER v DURCHFORT (Failure to Investigate) 35 CA4 1718 [See: Tool Research v Henigson 46 CA3 675; Norton v Hines 49 CA3 917; Sheldon Appel v Albert 47 C3 863]
|
|
