|
0804 REVIEW GRANTED If a claim for continuing nuisance is based on the existence of a latent construction defect, it is subject to the 10 year statute of limitations for latent construction defects rather than to the rules regarding limitation of continuing nuisance actions. CitationCHEVRON v SUPERIOR COURT (Continuing Defect) 31 CA4 1 [See: CCP 337.15; Grange v SuperCt 16 CA4 1349, T/AT 9/93; Wilshire v ARCO 20 CA4 732, T/AT 2/94; Mangini v Aerojet 230 CA3 1125; KFC v Meghrig 23 CA4 1167, T/AT 5/94; Newhall v SuperCt 19 CA4 334, T/AT 12/93; Capogeannis v SuperCt 12 CA4 668, T/AT 3/93]
|
|
