Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
0990 REVIEW DENIED Class-action plaintiffs who impliedly concede that their vehicles have remained fit for driving and who claim no personal injury or property damage resulting from an alleged defect in the vehicle design can not state a cause of action against the vehicle manufacturer for breach of implied warranty.CitationAMERICAN SUZUKI v SUPERIOR COURT (No Class) 37 CA4 1291 [See: CCP 382; Occidental v SuperCt 18 C3 355; Collins v Safeway 187 CA3 62] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||