Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
0949 REVIEW DENIED Although legal insanity may prevent an insured's act from being "willful" for purposes of coverage under InsC 533, irresistible impulse is not part of CA's definition of insanity.CitationJACOBS v FIRE INS EXCH (Irresistible Impulse) 36 CA4 1258 [See: InsC 533; JC Penney v MK 52 C3 1009; Marceau v Travellers' 101 C 338; Clemmer v Hartford 22 C3 865; M'Naghten's Case 8 EngRep 718; People v Hoin 62 C 120; PenC 25(b), 28] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||