|
0933 REVIEW GRANTED Damages for emotional distress resulting from interference with a financial interest should not be recoverable unless the distress is severe.CitationTORRES v AUTOMOBILE CLUB (Anger Not Distress) 36 CA4 972 [See: Neal v Farmers 21 C3 910; Pacific Mutual v Haslip 499 US 1; Royal Globe v SuperCt 23 C3 880; Moradi-Shalal v Fireman's Fund 46 C3 287; Merenda v SuperCt 3 CA4 1; Commercial Cotton v UCB 163 CA3 511; Twaite v Allstate 216 CA3 239; Crisci v Security 66 C2 425; Gruenberg v Aetna 9 C3 566; Jarchow v Transamerica 48 CA3 917]
|
