|
0963 REVIEW DENIED Attorney malpractice consisting of charging unconscionably excessive fees resulted in actual harm, and the statute of limitations began running on the client's malpractice action, when the document the attorney had been retained to prepare led to a judgment unfavorable to the client.CitationLEVIN v GRAHAM (Unsuccessful Initiative) 37 CA4 798 [See: CCP 340.6; Laird v Blacker 2 C4 606; ITT v Niles 9 C4 245, T/AT 2/95; Stoll v SuperCt 9 CA4 1362, T/AT 11/92; Schultz v Harney 27 CA4 1611, T/AT 10/94]
|
|
