Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
0991 REVIEW GRANTED Defendants who operated Jack-in-the-Box restaurants in Washington did not have sufficient connection with the state of California to justify acquisition of personal jurisdiction over them by the California courts.CitationVONS v SEABEST (E Coli) 37 CA4 1090 [See: CCP 410.10; Cornelison v Chaney 16 C3 143; Oregon v SuperCt 24 CA4 1550, T/AT 6/94; Helicopteros v Hall 466 US 408] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||