P1426 REVIEW GRANTED An arbitration provision contained in an employment agreement that required the employee to submit claims for job discrimination within one year was not unconscionable, even though the employee could have more time under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA).CitationPEARSON DENTAL v SUPERIOR COURT (Short Time Arbitration) 166 CA4 71 [See: CCP 1286.2; GovC 12960, 12965; City of Palo Alto v Service Employees 77 CA4 327, T/AT 2/00; Armendariz v Foundation Health 24 C4 83, T/AT 9/00; Martinez v Master 118 CA4 107, P/AT 7/04]
|
|