Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
P1342 Realty owners were not entitled to intervene in coverage litigation between a former owner of the realty and its insurer, because their claim that intervention could improve their chances of recovering damages and environmental cleanup costs was speculative and did not give them a sufficiently direct and immediate interest in the outcome.CitationROYAL INDEMNITY v UNITED (Intervention) 162 CA4 194 [See: CCP 387; San Francisco v State 128 CA4 1030, P/AT 7/05] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||