|
4722 REVIEW DENIED Conduct that causes de minimis inconvenience or embarrassment is not sufficient to result in liability for violating anti-retaliation or anti-intimidation provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Unruh Civil Rights Act, or the Disabled Persons Act; to constitute a violation, such conduct must go far enough beyond legitimate bounds to be materially adverse, but need not be traumatic.CitationWILSON v MURILLO (ADA Champion) 163 CA4 1124, [See: CivC 51 etseq, 54 etseq; 42 USC 12101 etseq; Higdon v Jackson 393 F3 1211; Hankins v El Torito 63 CA4 510, T/AT 6/98]
|
|
