4694 Under a Comprehensive General Liability policy that excluded coverage for a claim by one insured against another except in cases seeking to apportion liability between insureds, there was no coverage for an action by one insured against another based on the claim that the defendant abandoned a sub-contract before the work was finished and without repairing damage defendant had done to existing installations.CitationGREAT WESTERN v INTERSTATE FIRE INSURANCE v INTERSTATE (Cross-suits Exclusion) 161 CA4 1033 [See: Expressions v Ahmanson 86 CA4 1135, T/AT 3/01; CA Casualty v Northland 48 CA4 1682, T/AT 10/96]
|
|