|
P1395 A party's discovery abuse consisting of the repetitive submission of vacuous, meaningless responses to interrogatories after three orders of the court directing proper responses, and of ignoring a series of meet and confer letters, justified the imposition of a terminating sanction striking the party's answer and cross claim, and enabling the other party to obtain a default judgment.CitationLIBERTY MUTUAL v LcL (Terminating Sanction) 163 CA4 1093 [See: CCP 2023.010, 2030.290, 2023.030; Collisson v Hartunian 21 CA4 1611; Irvington-Moore v Superior Court 14 CA4 733; Juarez v Boy Scouts 81 CA4 377, T/AT 6/00; Mileikowsky v Tenet 128 CA4 262, P/AT 5/05]
|
|
