|
4634 REVIEW DENIED Policy language that covered sudden and accidental discharge or overflow of water from a plumbing appliance, but specifically provided that it did not cover mold resulting from such a discharge or any mold at all, did not violate either the Insurance Code or the efficient proximate cause doctrine, and since the language was plain and clear it validly excluded mold damage from coverage.CitationDE BRUYN v SUPERIOR COURT (Mold Exclusion) 158 CA4 1213 [See: InsC 530; Julian v Hartford 35 C4 747, T/AT 7/05]
|
|
