4609 REVIEW DENIED Under the bunkhouse rule, a resource ranger whose job required him to be on call at all times and who was permitted by the state to rent a residence in the state Desert District as part of his compensation package was within the scope of employment when injured on his day off as a result of a water leak in the residence and so was relegated to the exclusive remedies of workers compensation againts the state.CitationVAUGHT v STATE (Bunkhouse) 157 CA4 1538 [See: LabC 3600 etseq; Maher v WCAB 33 C3 729; Arriaga v County 9 C4 1055, T/AT 5/95]
|
|