|
P1401 REVIEW GRANTED If contract language is not clear enough to be unambiguous on its face, a trial court is required to provisionally consider proffered extrinsic evidence in determining whether the contract is ambiguous; since the trial court did not say whether it had done so in ruling the contract was not ambiguous, the matter was remanded for reconsideration.CitationLOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT v GREAT AMERICAN (Extrinsic Evidence) 163 CA4 944 [See: CivC 1625; CCP 1856; Wolf v Superior Court 114 CA4 1343, P/AT 3/04]
|
|
