4679 Unless by making factual misrepresentations the city induced the court to issue an injunction under an ordinance later declared to be unconstitutional, damage resulting from the injunction was not proximately caused by the city's seeking the injunction, because the independent judgment of the court that issued it was a superseding cause of the harm.CitationMANTA v CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO (Unconstitutional Ordinance) 43 C4 400 [See: 42 USC 1983; Brewer v Teano 40 CA4 1024, T/AT 1/96; Manta v City of San Bernardino (RevGrtd) 139 CA4 447, T/AT 6/06; Townes v City of NY 176 F3 138]
|
|