|
4687 In the absence of allegations that plaintiff had existing relationships with a potential of economic advantage that were disrupted by defendant's conduct or that such disruption resulted in economic loss, an action for interference with economic advantage is not pleaded; real property cannot be the subject of conversion; once a SLAPP motion is made, defects in the subject pleading cannot be cured by amendment; liability for filing lis pendens and other legal notices is prevented by the Litigation Privilege.CitationSALMA v CAPON (Interference by Trespass) 161 CA4 1275 [See: CCP 425.16; Arluk v Dobler 116 CA4 1324, T/AT 5/04; Korea Supply v Lockheed 29 C4 1134, T/AT 4/03; Della Penna v Toyota 11 C4 376, T/AT 12/95]
|
|
